SCA practice case · Video consultation
“I’ve been having accidents — I can’t always make it to the toilet — I’ve been too ashamed to tell anyone”
Video consultation
Adult patient
Typical
Gender, reproductive & sexual healthOlder adultsHealth disadvantage & vulnerabilities
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Patricia Lowe · 62 years · female
Setting
Video consultation, with the examination (including a chaperoned DRE) arranged face to face — disclosed bowel incontinence.
Past history
- 3 vaginal deliveries (1 forceps)
Medication
- See repeat list
Allergies
None recorded
Recent notes
Booked for another problem.
Reason for contact
End of consultation: “There’s something I’ve not told anyone…”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Faecal incontinence is deeply STIGMATISED and under-reported, often hidden for years and disclosed tentatively (here after booking about something else; NICE CG49 advises asking in higher-risk groups such as women after childbirth), so the first task is COMMUNICATION: respond with genuine empathy and without embarrassment, thank and validate the patient, normalise that it is common and often TREATABLE, and give it the time it deserves. Then ASSESS systematically: characterise it as URGE incontinence (urgency, cannot reach the toilet — often sphincter/neurological) versus PASSIVE incontinence/soiling (unaware — internal sphincter dysfunction or OVERFLOW), and assess stool CONSISTENCY (loose stool is harder to control; constipation with overflow soiling is a common, treatable cause), frequency, pad use and psychosocial impact. Screen causes and contributors: OBSTETRIC anal sphincter injury (vaginal deliveries/forceps — a key cause in women), diarrhoea or constipation with overflow, IBS/IBD, diabetes and neurological disease, rectal prolapse/haemorrhoids, anorectal surgery, medications, and cognitive/mobility/access factors. Critically, EXCLUDE the RED FLAGS that change the pathway: a CHANGE IN BOWEL HABIT, RECTAL BLEEDING or unintentional WEIGHT LOSS (consider colorectal pathology — NICE NG12: FIT for a change in bowel habit, with suspected cancer pathway referral if FIT is 10 µg Hb/g faeces or more (NICE HTG690) or a rectal mass is felt; examination including DRE), and NEUROLOGICAL features — saddle anaesthesia or new bowel/bladder incontinence with back pain/leg weakness (CAUDA EQUINA, a neurosurgical emergency). Examine face to face with consent and a chaperone offered (GMC) — the abdomen, perianal area and a digital rectal examination (resting/squeeze tone, faecal impaction/overflow, masses), and manage first-line conservatively (NICE CG49: treat constipation/overflow or diarrhoea, optimise stool consistency, loperamide for loose stool if no contraindication, bowel-retraining/scheduled toileting, supervised pelvic floor muscle training (NICE NG210), skin care and continence products), referring to continence services and/or colorectal (sphincter assessment, biofeedback, surgery) as indicated — and via the cancer pathway if red flags. The hidden agenda is the shame-laden disclosure itself and a belief that nothing can be done; receive it compassionately, assess systematically, exclude red flags, address the psychosocial/mood impact, and give realistic hope. NICE NG12/lower-GI assessment applies where there is a change in bowel habit or rectal bleeding.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.