SCA practice case · Video consultation
“I lost the last one — is this happening again?”
Video consultation
Adult patient
Typical
Gender, reproductive & sexual healthUrgent & unscheduled care
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Leila Haddad · 29 years · female
Setting
Video consultation — light bleeding at 9 weeks pregnant.
Past history
- Pregnant — 9 weeks
- Miscarriage at 7 weeks last year
Medication
- Folic acid
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
Private scan 1 week ago: intrauterine pregnancy, fetal heartbeat seen. Blood group O RhD-positive. ⚠ Booked as urgent: bleeding since this morning.
Reason for contact
Urgent video appointment: vaginal bleeding in pregnancy.
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Light bleeding with mild cramps in a confirmed early intrauterine pregnancy is threatened miscarriage — but the question of ectopic and significant haemorrhage must always be screened (severe/one-sided pain, shoulder-tip pain, dizziness/syncope, heavy flooding); here they are absent and a recent scan showed a heartbeat. The meaningful "action" is prompt EPAU assessment (a scan) and, because she has had a previous miscarriage and has a scan-confirmed intrauterine pregnancy, vaginal micronised progesterone 400 mg twice daily as NICE NG126 recommends (continued to 16 completed weeks if a heartbeat is confirmed) — not unproven bed rest. Rh status is handled correctly (NICE NG126: no anti-D for threatened miscarriage up to and including 11+6 weeks; she is RhD-positive regardless). But the case is really about communication: respond to the trauma of a previous loss FIRST, give honest balanced information (bleeding is common and many pregnancies continue, but no guarantees), and — the examinable hidden agenda — LIFT the self-blame: normal activity does not cause miscarriage and early loss is almost always chromosomal, never the mother’s fault. Offer genuine non-false reassurance, a concrete EPAU plan, precise emergency safety-netting, and support whatever the outcome.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.