SCA practice case · Video consultation

“I lost the last one — is this happening again?”

Video consultation Adult patient Typical Gender, reproductive & sexual healthUrgent & unscheduled care

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Leila Haddad · 29 years · female
Setting
Video consultation — light bleeding at 9 weeks pregnant.
Past history
  • Pregnant — 9 weeks
  • Miscarriage at 7 weeks last year
Medication
  • Folic acid
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
Private scan 1 week ago: intrauterine pregnancy, fetal heartbeat seen. Blood group O RhD-positive. ⚠ Booked as urgent: bleeding since this morning.
Reason for contact
Urgent video appointment: vaginal bleeding in pregnancy.

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Light bleeding with mild cramps in a confirmed early intrauterine pregnancy is threatened miscarriage — but the question of ectopic and significant haemorrhage must always be screened (severe/one-sided pain, shoulder-tip pain, dizziness/syncope, heavy flooding); here they are absent and a recent scan showed a heartbeat. The meaningful "action" is prompt EPAU assessment (a scan) and, because she has had a previous miscarriage and has a scan-confirmed intrauterine pregnancy, vaginal micronised progesterone 400 mg twice daily as NICE NG126 recommends (continued to 16 completed weeks if a heartbeat is confirmed) — not unproven bed rest. Rh status is handled correctly (NICE NG126: no anti-D for threatened miscarriage up to and including 11+6 weeks; she is RhD-positive regardless). But the case is really about communication: respond to the trauma of a previous loss FIRST, give honest balanced information (bleeding is common and many pregnancies continue, but no guarantees), and — the examinable hidden agenda — LIFT the self-blame: normal activity does not cause miscarriage and early loss is almost always chromosomal, never the mother’s fault. Offer genuine non-false reassurance, a concrete EPAU plan, precise emergency safety-netting, and support whatever the outcome.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.