SCA practice case · Video consultation
“My sperm test came back abnormal — does this mean we’ll never have kids, and is it my fault?”
Video consultation
Adult patient
Typical
Gender, reproductive & sexual healthInvestigations & resultsMental health & addiction
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Tom Whitfield · 34 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — results of a semen analysis in a couple trying to conceive.
Past history
- Trying to conceive with partner for ~14 months
Medication
- None recorded
Allergies
None recorded
Recent notes
⚠ Semen analysis (first sample): low count (oligozoospermia) and reduced motility.
Reason for contact
“The sperm test came back abnormal. Is it my fault?”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
An abnormal semen analysis must be interpreted and communicated carefully. A single abnormal sample should be CONFIRMED with a REPEAT before drawing conclusions — sperm parameters vary widely and are affected by recent illness/fever, abstinence period and collection — and because spermatogenesis takes about 72 days, NICE NG257 advises the repeat ideally 3 months after the first (as soon as possible if grossly abnormal/azoospermic). Take a male-factor history and address MODIFIABLE contributors (smoking, alcohol, recreational drugs — notably anabolic steroids, which suppress sperm production — obesity, medications, occupational exposures, and intercourse timing/frequency; raised scrotal temperature is associated with poorer semen quality, though benefit from looser clothing is uncertain), which can meaningfully improve borderline results. EXAMINE face to face (not on video; chaperone offered) testicular volume, varicocele, absent vas and hypogonadism signs, and — critically — PALPATE FOR A TESTICULAR MASS, because subfertile men have a somewhat increased testicular-cancer risk and NICE NG12 (Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, last updated April 2026) advises considering a suspected cancer pathway referral for a non-painful enlargement or change in shape or texture of the testis (and direct-access ultrasound for unexplained or persistent testicular symptoms); do not miss this while focused on fertility. Arrange hormonal tests (FSH, LH, testosterone ± prolactin; genetic/specialist tests if severe) and refer to fertility/andrology services now (NICE NG257: after 1 year of trying the couple is assessed together — at 14 months they qualify), framing fertility as a COUPLE issue — the partner must be assessed in parallel and a male abnormality does not mean the cause is solely his. Avoid false despair: abnormal results do not mean "never", many men with low counts conceive (especially after optimisation), and assisted options (IVF, and IVF with ICSI — which can fertilise with very few sperm) exist, with counselling offered (NICE QS73; HFEA Code of Practice). The hidden agenda is self-blame and guilt, with the patient choosing to hear it alone; address the blame compassionately (fertility issues are common, multifactorial and not a personal failing or matter of fault), correct the catastrophe, manage the emotional/relationship impact, encourage involving the partner, and deliver accurate information — neither cold facts nor false reassurance.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.