SCA practice case · Telephone consultation
“I’m going to the loo ten times a day with blood — can you just call something in?”
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Aisha Rahman · 29 years · female
Setting
Telephone consultation — a known UC patient flaring.
Past history
- Ulcerative colitis — left-sided
Medication
- Mesalazine
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Telephone request (Monday a.m.): “UC flare — please call steroids in to chemist.” No recent bloods on file.
Reason for contact
Phone call-back. “Can you just call something in?”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A UC flare is SCORED, not eyeballed, and telephone triage must quantify it precisely: stool frequency, amount of blood, NOCTURNAL stools (a marker of active disease), urgency, abdominal pain and systemic upset. The Truelove & Witts criteria define ACUTE SEVERE ulcerative colitis — ≥6 bloody stools per day PLUS at least one systemic feature (temperature >37.8°C, pulse >90, haemoglobin <105 g/L, or raised CRP/ESR). A patient with ~10 bloody stools/day, nocturnal symptoms, fever and exhaustion meets these criteria, and acute severe UC is a medical EMERGENCY (toxic megacolon, perforation, VTE risk) demanding SAME-DAY assessment/admission for IV steroids, bloods (FBC, CRP, U&E, albumin), stool culture including C. difficile, and gastroenterology — NOT a telephone prescription of oral steroids, which would be a serious safety failure. Screen in-flare red flags (severe pain/distension, high fever, dehydration/shock, vomiting, tachycardia) and counsel on VTE risk, but do not downgrade an acute-severe flare that lacks them. Telephone triage’s job is accurate severity assessment, danger-sign screening, clear safety-netting and correct disposition via the acute/IBD pathway. Long-standing extensive colitis warrants colonoscopic CRC surveillance — worth confirming as a future-care point, but it is not a reason for an urgent cancer referral during an acute flare. NICE CG118 starts surveillance 10 years after symptom onset (BSG 2019: 8 years). The hidden agenda is real work/childcare pressure and hospital avoidance with minimisation; validate it, problem-solve the barriers, be honest the flare is too severe for a phone fix, and bring her safely to same-day care.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.