SCA practice case · Video consultation

“My mate’s mum found vapes and some pills in my bag — it’s no big deal, everyone does it. You won’t tell my parents, right?”

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Kai · 15 years · male
Setting
Video consultation, seen on his own — a teenager who attends reluctantly over substance use (no examination needed).
Past history
  • Not stated in the case
Medication
  • Check repeat record
Allergies
None recorded
Recent notes
Vapes and some pills found in his bag by a friend’s mother. Attends reluctantly.
Reason for contact
“You won’t tell my parents, right?”

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Substance misuse in a teenager is an ADOLESCENT consultation where engagement and safeguarding matter as much as the drugs. Build RAPPORT and engage the young person directly and non-judgementally — a lecture loses them. Clarify CONFIDENTIALITY honestly at the outset, seeing the young person alone: under GMC 0–18 years guidance they are owed the same duty of confidentiality as adults, and information is shared without consent only where needed to protect them or others from a risk of serious harm (safeguarding), telling them first where safe; being upfront builds trust and is more honest than promising blanket secrecy. Take a structured HEADSS psychosocial assessment — Home, Education/employment, Activities, Drugs (and alcohol/vaping: what, how much, route, frequency, context, who with, how funded), Sexuality/relationships, and Suicide/self-harm/mood/Safety — framing the substance use within the whole of the young person’s life. Critically, assess RISK and SAFEGUARDING: child criminal/sexual EXPLOITATION (county lines — unexplained money/items, older "friends", going missing, being recruited to carry or sell, owing money/debt bondage), abuse/neglect, mental-health/self-harm, dependence and risky behaviours — questions about where substances come from, who supplies them and any debts can reveal exploitation — and involve safeguarding where indicated (practice safeguarding lead and children’s social care, Working Together to Safeguard Children 2023; Home Office county lines guidance). Assess and record GILLICK competence, provide HARM-REDUCTION and motivational advice (honest information without scare-mongering, exploring the young person’s own goals — unidentified illicit pills may be counterfeit and contain nitazenes, so not alone, not with alcohol, 999 if someone can’t be woken; selling vapes to under-18s is illegal) rather than moralising, screen mood and self-harm (NICE NG225), and signpost/refer to young people’s substance-misuse (NICE NG64) and mental-health services, involving parents/a trusted adult and safeguarding where proportionate and in the young person’s interests. The skill is engaging the adolescent, handling confidentiality correctly, HEADSS/safeguarding (especially exploitation), harm reduction not lecturing, and appropriate signposting/referral.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.