General Practice · Full case

Safeguarding

Children & adultsRecognise · respond · refer · recordImmediate danger = 999
SG
Safeguarding (Children & Adults) · Clinical Reasoning Framework v2
GP & SCA · recognise the signs · respond & share · refer to the right pathway · record · domestic abuse · MCA & capacity · the GP's statutory duty
Recognise · Respond · Refer · RecordThe four Rs of safeguarding. Recognise the signs and listen; respond appropriately and don't promise confidentiality you can't keep; refer to the right pathway (children's social care / adult safeguarding / police / MARAC); record contemporaneously, factually, including what was said in the person's own words
Safeguarding is everyone's businessEvery clinician has a duty to safeguard children and adults at risk. If in doubt, discuss with the practice safeguarding lead/named professional and the local safeguarding hub. You don't need proof to refer — reasonable concern is enough. Acting on suspicion is the duty
Think family / think the whole householdA concern about one person often signals risk to others — children of a parent with mental illness/substance use/domestic abuse ("Think Family"), or other dependents/vulnerable adults in the home. Always consider who else may be at risk, including unborn babies and siblings
Children: types & red flagsAbuse types: physical, emotional, sexual, neglect, fabricated/induced illness. Red flags: injury inconsistent with the history/development, delayed presentation, a non-mobile child with a bruise/fracture, disclosure, neglect, FGM, child sexual exploitation/trafficking, parental risk factors. Bruising in a non-mobile baby is a major red flag
Adults at risk & the 6 principlesAn "adult at risk" has care/support needs and cannot protect themselves. Care Act categories: physical, psychological/emotional, sexual, financial, neglect/self-neglect, discriminatory, organisational, domestic, modern slavery. Principles: Empowerment, Prevention, Proportionality, Protection, Partnership, Accountability — making safeguarding personal
Capacity changes the routeFor adults, mental capacity (Mental Capacity Act) and the person's wishes matter — a capacitous adult can decline a referral (except where others are at risk, a serious crime, or duties like FGM/terrorism). Where capacity is lacking, act in best interests. Coercion/undue influence may impair capacity in domestic abuse
Domestic abuse — ask & actDomestic abuse (physical, sexual, psychological, financial, coercive control) is common and dangerous; enquire sensitively when indicated, assess risk (e.g. DASH), safety-plan, and refer (IDVA/MARAC for high risk). Children in the household are affected — consider them. Never raise it in front of the suspected perpetrator
Information sharing is justifiedConfidentiality is not absolute. Where there is a risk of serious harm, sharing relevant information without consent is justified and expected; for children, the child's welfare is paramount. Mandatory reporting applies to FGM in under-18s. Document the rationale for sharing or not sharing
📋 Clinical Stem — Safeguarding
A mother attends with her toddler for a minor rash — but you notice a finger-mark bruise on the child's arm, a delayed presentation, an inconsistent story, and the mother seems frightened of her partner
Chloe Davies, 24, brings her 14-month-old son for what she says is a rash. While examining him you notice a cluster of finger-tip bruises on his upper arm and an older bruise on his cheek. When you ask how they happened, Chloe gives a vague, changing account ("he's always bumping into things"), avoids eye contact, and flinches when her phone buzzes — it's her partner. She mentions, quietly, that things at home are "stressful" and that her partner "has a temper". She seems exhausted and low. There is a 6-year-old sibling at home. Chloe asks you not to "make a fuss" and says her partner will be angry if she's late.
This stem tests safeguarding reasoning across children and adults at once: recognising the red flags of possible non-accidental injury in a young child (bruising in a barely-mobile toddler, finger-mark pattern, an injury inconsistent and changing in the history, delayed presentation), AND the signs of possible domestic abuse of the mother (fear of the partner, coercive control, low mood) with a "Think Family" risk to both children; responding appropriately (listening, not promising confidentiality you can't keep, not raising domestic abuse if the perpetrator were present, ensuring immediate safety); referring correctly (children's social care for the child — the child's welfare is paramount and consent is not required where there is risk of significant harm; domestic-abuse services/MARAC and adult safeguarding as appropriate); recording factually in the child's and mother's own words; sharing information lawfully; and involving the practice safeguarding lead. The SCA challenge is to act decisively to protect the child and support the mother, balancing engagement with the duty to refer, without colluding with "don't make a fuss".
Scenario A — Child NAI + maternal domestic abuse (this stem) Recognise NAI red flags + domestic abuse; ensure safety; refer children's social care (child welfare paramount, consent not required where significant-harm risk); domestic-abuse/IDVA/MARAC; Think Family (sibling); record & share lawfully; safeguarding lead.
Scenario B — Child neglect / FII / CSE Neglect (failure to thrive, missed appointments, dirty/unsafe), fabricated/induced illness, child sexual exploitation/trafficking, FGM (mandatory reporting in under-18s). Refer per pathway.
Scenario C — Adult at risk (Care Act) Vulnerable adult with care/support needs unable to protect themselves — financial abuse, neglect, self-neglect. Adult safeguarding; capacity (MCA); making safeguarding personal.
Scenario D — Capacitous adult declining referral A capacitous adult can decline a safeguarding referral — unless others at risk, serious crime, or statutory duty (FGM). Support, safety-plan, keep the door open; document.
Scenario E — Immediate danger A child or adult in immediate danger → 999/emergency; don't delay for process.
Key variables to adapt for Child vs adult; abuse type; NAI red flags (non-mobile child, inconsistent history); domestic abuse & coercive control (DASH/MARAC); capacity & the person's wishes (MCA); Think Family/other dependents; consent & lawful information sharing; mandatory duties (FGM); immediate danger; recording; the safeguarding lead.
Steps:
1
Step 1
Recognise & Respond — The Signs · Listen · Don't Over-Promise · Think Family · ICE
collapse
The first task is to recognise the concern and respond well: notice the red flags, listen without leading, respond with empathy but without promising a confidentiality you cannot keep, ensure immediate safety, and think about everyone in the household. Here there are two intertwined concerns — possible non-accidental injury to the toddler, and possible domestic abuse of the mother — with a sibling also at risk.
🎓 SCA framing — empathic, honest, child-focused
"Thank you for telling me things are stressful — that took courage, and I want to help. I need to be honest with you: my first job is to make sure your little boy and you are safe, and if I'm ever worried about that, I can't keep it just between us — but I'll always be open with you about what I'm doing and why."
Never promise to keep a safeguarding concern secret. Being honest about the limits of confidentiality, while remaining supportive and non-judgmental, is both ethical and a marked skill.
1A — Recognise the signs (child & adult)
Question / observationWhy it mattersChanges what?
🟢 OPEN / OBSERVE"Tell me how the bruises happened" — and note the explanation, the child's development, and the interaction. The history is the key safeguarding tool. An injury that is inconsistent with the given mechanism or the child's developmental stage, a changing or vague account, and delayed presentation are core NAI red flags. Finger-tip bruising and bruising in a barely-mobile toddler are especially concerning — most importantly, bruising in a NON-mobile infant.In SCA: noticing the inconsistency and the pattern, and not accepting the vague story, is the pivotal recognition step. Inconsistent injury in a young child → NAI concern
🚩 Child NAI red flags"Has this happened before? Who looks after him? Are there other children at home?"Pattern injuries, multiple injuries of different ages, a non-mobile child with bruising/fracture, delayed/inconsistent presentation, disclosure, neglect signs and parental risk factors all raise NAI. The 6-year-old sibling must be considered (Think Family). The child's welfare is paramount.NAI red flags → safeguard the child; refer children's social care.Refer children's social care (welfare paramount)
🚩 Domestic abuse (the mother)"You mentioned things are stressful and your partner has a temper — can you tell me more? Do you ever feel frightened or controlled at home?"Chloe's fear, flinching, low mood and "his temper" suggest possible domestic abuse (including coercive control). Enquire sensitively WHEN SAFE — never with the suspected perpetrator present. Domestic abuse endangers her and the children. Assess risk and consider IDVA/MARAC.Domestic abuse → risk assess (DASH); safety plan; IDVA/MARAC; consider the children.Domestic abuse → safety plan + MARAC/IDVA
Respond appropriately"I'm not going to share this with your partner, and I'll explain anything I do — but I can't promise to keep concerns about safety just between us."Respond with empathy and honesty: don't promise unconditional confidentiality, don't collude with "don't make a fuss", don't alert a suspected perpetrator. Ensure immediate safety. Listening and not leading the child/parent (avoid suggestive questioning) preserves any future investigation.Honest, non-colluding response → protects the child while keeping engagement.Don't over-promise; ensure safety
Think Family / who else is at risk"Who else lives in the home, and are there other children or vulnerable adults?"A concern about one person signals risk to others — the sibling, an unborn baby, other dependents or vulnerable adults. "Think Family" is core: safeguard everyone potentially affected, not just the person in front of you.Other dependents → include in the safeguarding response.Safeguard siblings/others too
Capacity & wishes (for adults)(For the adult dimension) "What would you like to happen, and what are you worried about?"For the adult (mother), her wishes and capacity matter (making safeguarding personal). A capacitous adult can decline help for herself — but NOT where the children are at risk (their welfare overrides), or a serious crime/statutory duty applies. Coercion can impair capacity.Capacity/wishes shape the adult route; child risk overrides.Empower the adult; protect the child regardless
1B — Red flags
🚨

Red Flags — when to act now

Red flagWhy it mattersAction
Child or adult in immediate dangerRisk to life/serious harm now.999 / emergency; ensure immediate safety; don't delay for process
Bruising/fracture in a non-mobile infant; injury inconsistent with history/developmentStrong marker of non-accidental injury.Refer children's social care urgently; paediatric assessment; don't accept the explanation at face value
Disclosure of abuse (child or adult)Must be taken seriously and acted on.Listen, don't lead; reassure; record in their words; refer
High-risk domestic abuseRisk of serious harm/homicide; affects children.DASH risk assessment; safety plan; IDVA/MARAC; never raise with the perpetrator present
FGM in/at risk in an under-18Mandatory reporting duty.Report to police (under-18 FGM); safeguarding referral
Adult at risk unable to protect themselves (Care Act)Neglect/self-neglect, financial/sexual/physical abuse, modern slavery.Adult safeguarding referral; capacity assessment; making safeguarding personal
1C — ICE
💭 Ideas
"What do you think has been happening — and what's worrying you about home?"
Surfacing the mother's understanding may bring a disclosure or reveal her fear and the coercive control. It also helps gauge insight and safety, and keeps her engaged in a process that must, regardless, protect the children.
😟 Concerns
"What are you most frightened of — for yourself and for the children?"
Her concern is likely her partner's reaction and losing her children. Naming and addressing these fears (you'll be honest, you'll support her, the aim is safety not punishment) is what allows her to engage rather than flee.
🎯 Expectations
"You've asked me not to make a fuss — let me explain what I have to do and why."
She wants you to do nothing. Naming this lets you explain, honestly and kindly, that you cannot ignore a concern about a child's safety — that you'll act transparently and supportively, but you must act.
1D — Psychosocial context
🫂 The frightened parent, the silent child, and the duty that overrides discomfort

Safeguarding consultations are uncomfortable: they sit between compassion for a struggling, frightened adult and an absolute duty to protect a child who cannot protect themselves. The pull to collude — to accept the vague explanation, to "not make a fuss", to keep a parent on side — is exactly the pull that lets abuse continue. The skilled clinician holds empathy for the adult and decisive protection of the child together: listening without leading, being honest about confidentiality, ensuring immediate safety, and acting on reasonable concern by referring — because in safeguarding, doing nothing is itself a decision with consequences.

👶 The child comes first

The child's welfare is paramount and overrides the parent's wish for secrecy.

"I can hear you don't want a fuss, and I'll be as supportive as I can — but my first duty is your son's safety, and that's something I can't set aside."
🤝 Support, not punishment

Frame safeguarding as help for the family.

"This isn't about blame or taking your children — it's about getting your family the right support and keeping everyone safe. I'll be honest with you every step."
🔒 Honest about confidentiality

Never promise to keep safety concerns secret.

"I won't tell your partner anything, but I can't promise to keep worries about safety just between us — I'll always tell you what I'm doing and why."
🛟 Safety now

Address immediate safety for mother and children.

"Before anything else — are you and the children safe to go home today, or do we need to sort somewhere safe right now?"
🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 1TasksRelating to OthersGlobal Skills
Key phrases that score
"I can't promise to keep safety concerns just between us." — honest about confidentiality.
"My first duty is your son's safety." — child welfare paramount.
"Are you and the children safe to go home today?" — immediate safety + Think Family.
Deductions
  • Colluding with "don't make a fuss"; promising secrecy
  • Accepting an inconsistent injury history at face value
  • Not recognising domestic abuse / not thinking of the sibling
  • Raising domestic abuse with the perpetrator present; leading questions
🔴 Red
Accepts the story; promises secrecy; no child/sibling safeguarding; misses domestic abuse; no referral
🟠 Amber
Recognises a concern; some safety enquiry; confidentiality handled partly; referral intended but vague; ICE partial
🟢 Green
Recognises NAI + domestic abuse; honest re confidentiality; immediate safety; Think Family; plans children's social care + DA referral; ICE all three
2
Step 2
Triage — Immediate Danger · Urgent Referral · Support & Monitor
collapse
Triage by risk: immediate danger means 999/emergency and ensuring safety now; significant-harm concerns (NAI, high-risk domestic abuse, adult at serious risk) need urgent referral to the right pathway; lower-level concerns need support, early help and monitoring — but always discuss with the safeguarding lead if unsure.
🔴 Immediate danger

Now / 999

Protect now
  • Child/adult at risk of serious harm now999/emergency; ensure safety
  • Acute injury / unsafe to go homeAdmit/paediatrics; safe place
  • High-risk domestic abusePolice/IDVA; do not alert perpetrator
🟠 Urgent referral

Same day

Right pathway
  • Suspected NAI / significant harm (child)Children's social care (consent not required)
  • Adult at risk (Care Act)Adult safeguarding
  • FGM under-18Police (mandatory) + safeguarding
🟢 Support

Early help / monitor

With lead
  • Lower-level concernEarly help; health visitor; support
  • Capacitous adult declining (self only)Support; safety-plan; door open
  • UncertainDiscuss with safeguarding lead/hub
🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 2Tasks
Triage rationale
"Because of the bruising and the worries at home, I need to refer to children's social care today to keep your son and his sibling safe, and get you support around the domestic situation — and I'll check you're safe to leave here."
Deductions
  • Not referring suspected NAI urgently
  • Delaying protection for "process"
3
Step 3
Assessment — Examine Carefully & Document · Risk · Capacity · The Whole Picture
collapse
Examination is careful, documented and proportionate: assess and accurately record the injuries (site, size, pattern, age, with body maps), the child's development and demeanour, the parent's presentation, and the risk — and assess capacity where the concern is an adult. Don't conduct a forensic examination you're not trained for; refer to paediatrics/specialists.
🔎 Examine & record
CheckWhy
Injuries — site/size/pattern/age (body map)Document factually; pattern/inconsistency = NAI clue.
Development & mobilityIs the injury plausible for the child's stage?
Demeanour / interactionFear, frozen watchfulness, parent-child interaction.
Growth / neglect signsFailure to thrive, hygiene, missed appointments.
🧠 Risk & capacity
CheckWhy
Domestic-abuse risk (DASH)Gauge severity; MARAC threshold.
Adult capacity (MCA)Where the concern is an adult at risk.
Mother's mental healthLow mood/risk; impact on parenting/support.
Other household membersSibling, vulnerable adults (Think Family).
🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 3TasksGlobal Skills
Doing it well
"I'll carefully document the bruises with a body map and note exactly what you told me, in your words — that's important for getting your family the right help."
Deductions
  • Not documenting injuries/history accurately
  • Attempting a forensic exam beyond competence rather than referring
4
Step 4
Information — Record Factually · Share Lawfully · Check the Records
collapse
"Investigation" in safeguarding is information: contemporaneous factual recording (including the person's own words and the rationale for decisions), lawful information sharing where there is a risk of serious harm, and checking existing records and other agencies' information to build the picture.
📝 Record
ElementDetail
Contemporaneous & factualWhat you saw/heard, in the person's own words; date/time; distinguish fact from opinion.
Body maps / injury documentationObjective injury record.
Rationale for decisionsWhy you did/didn't refer or share — defensible.
Flag the recordSafeguarding flags; alert the team appropriately.
🔗 Share & gather
ElementDetail
Lawful information sharingWithout consent where risk of serious harm; child welfare paramount; proportionate & relevant.
Check existing recordsPrevious concerns, attendances, family history.
Multi-agency informationHealth visitor, school, social care, police.
Mandatory dutiesFGM (under-18) reporting; document.
🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 4Tasks
Key reasoning
"I'll record exactly what I've seen and what you've said, check whether there have been any previous concerns, and share the relevant information with social care — which I'm able to do because it's about keeping a child safe."
Deductions
  • Not recording factually / not checking records
  • Withholding information that should be shared (or sharing more than necessary)
5
Step 5
Formulation — Who Is at Risk · From What · How Urgently
collapse
The "diagnosis" is a safeguarding formulation: who is at risk (the child, the sibling, the mother), from what (NAI, domestic abuse, neglect), how urgently, and what the right response and pathway are — anchored to the principle that a child's welfare is paramount.
At riskFrom / response
The toddlerPossible non-accidental injury (inconsistent bruising in a young child) → children's social care referral; paediatric assessment; consent not required where significant-harm risk.
The 6-year-old siblingAt risk in the same household (Think Family) → include in the safeguarding response.
The motherPossible domestic abuse/coercive control → risk assessment, safety plan, IDVA/MARAC; support; her wishes/capacity matter for her own safety, but the children's safety overrides.
UrgencyImmediate safety today; same-day referral; emergency if immediate danger.

🚩 Act on reasonable concern — the child's welfare is paramount

The formulation: a young child with possible non-accidental injury, a sibling at risk, and a mother experiencing possible domestic abuse. You do not need proof — reasonable concern is enough to refer. The plan: ensure immediate safety, refer to children's social care today (consent not required given the significant-harm risk), risk-assess and refer the domestic abuse (IDVA/MARAC) without alerting the perpetrator, record factually, share lawfully, involve the practice safeguarding lead, and follow up.

🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 5Tasks
Stating the formulation
"My concern is that your son's bruises may not be accidental, that his sibling could be at risk too, and that you may be experiencing abuse at home. I don't need to be certain to act — I have to refer to keep everyone safe, and I'll support you through it."
Deductions
  • Waiting for "proof" before acting
  • Forgetting the sibling/the mother
6
Step 6
Refer — Children's Social Care · Adult Safeguarding · Police/MARAC · Safeguarding Lead
collapse
Referral is the decisive action: the right pathway for each concern — children's social care, adult safeguarding, police, MARAC/IDVA — coordinated through the practice safeguarding lead and the local safeguarding hub, with emergency services for immediate danger.
ReferralWho / whenUrgency
🔴 Emergency (999/police)Immediate danger; suspected serious crime.Now
Children's social careSuspected significant harm/NAI/neglect (consent not required where risk).Same day
Adult safeguardingAdult at risk (Care Act) — neglect, financial/sexual/physical abuse, modern slavery.Per risk
Domestic abuse — IDVA / MARACDomestic abuse; MARAC for high-risk; IDVA support.Per risk
Practice safeguarding lead / hubDiscuss, coordinate, document; named professionals.Always
🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 6Tasks
The decisive action
"I'm going to refer to children's social care today and speak to our safeguarding lead, and get you connected to a domestic-abuse worker. If at any point you or the children are in immediate danger, call 999."
Deductions
  • Not referring / wrong pathway
  • Not involving the safeguarding lead
7
Step 7
Manage & Follow Through — Safety · Support · Record · Multi-Agency · Review
collapse
Management is following through: ensuring immediate safety, making and documenting the referrals, supporting the family (without colluding), participating in multi-agency work (strategy/conference), safety-planning the domestic abuse, considering all household members, and reviewing — safeguarding is a process, not a single act.
🛡️ Act & support
ElementDetail
Immediate safetyEnsure the child/adult is safe today; emergency if needed.
Make & document referralsChildren's social care, DA services, safeguarding lead; record rationale.
Support the familyEmpathic, non-colluding; support the mother; early help.
Safety plan (domestic abuse)Don't alert the perpetrator; IDVA; risk-led plan.
🔁 Follow through
ElementDetail
Multi-agency workingStrategy discussion/case conference; share information.
Think FamilySibling, other dependents, unborn baby — all considered.
Review & continuityFollow up the referral outcome; ongoing vigilance.
Reflect / supervisionSafeguarding supervision; learn from the case.
Keep the door openMaintain the therapeutic relationship where possible.
🎓 SCA Checkpoint — Step 7TasksRelating to OthersGlobal Skills
A plan that scores
"So today: I'll make sure you and the children are safe to leave, refer to children's social care and speak to our safeguarding lead, connect you with a domestic-abuse worker, and document everything carefully. This is to support your family and keep everyone safe — and I'll follow it up and keep seeing you."
Deductions
  • Referring but not ensuring immediate safety / not safety-planning DA
  • Forgetting the sibling/multi-agency working
  • Colluding or being punitive toward the mother
Safeguarding — SCA Consultation Scorecard
Recognise · respond · refer · record · child welfare paramount · domestic abuse · Think Family
0/ 33 pts
🌐
Global Skills
Structure, language, responsiveness
0/7
Tasks
Clinical reasoning, duty, management
0/15
🤝
Relating to Others
Communication, rapport, shared decisions
0/11
RAG Self-Assessment
🔴 Red
Accepts the story; promises secrecy; no child/sibling safeguarding; misses DA; no referral; waits for proof
🟠 Amber
Recognises a concern; some safety/recording; referral intended but vague; DA/Think Family partial; ICE partial
🟢 Green
Recognises NAI + DA; honest re confidentiality; immediate safety; children's social care + DA referral; Think Family; record/share lawfully; safeguarding lead; ICE all three
011172533
Fail
Borderline
Pass
Strong pass
📋
Complete the checklist to see your score and feedback
"It's just a rash, doctor, that's all — he's fine, he's always bumping into things. Please don't make a fuss, I really need to get going, my partner's waiting and he gets cross if I'm late."
Who you are (Chloe, the mother)

Chloe Davies, 24, with your 14-month-old son (you came about a "rash"). You're exhausted, low, and frightened of your partner, who "has a temper". There are finger-tip bruises on your son's arm and an older bruise on his cheek; when asked, you give vague, changing explanations ("he's always bumping into things") and avoid eye contact. You flinch when your phone buzzes (it's your partner). You have a 6-year-old at home too. You're terrified of your partner finding out you've said anything, and terrified your children will be taken away — so you want the doctor to do nothing and let you leave.

Hidden concerns (reveal if explored gently)

Fear of the partner (main): you're scared of his reaction; you'll hint at coercive control / his temper if the doctor is gentle and you feel safe.

Fear of losing the children: this is why you want no fuss; reassurance that it's about support and safety, not removal, helps you engage.

Your own low mood: you're worn down; you'll admit it if asked kindly.

Details if asked
  • Finger-mark bruising on the toddler's arm + older cheek bruise; vague/changing explanation; delayed coming in
  • Partner with a "temper"; you feel frightened and controlled; phone buzzing = him
  • A 6-year-old sibling at home
  • You're exhausted and low; you don't want anyone told; you fear your children being removed
Reactions at key moments
  • If the doctor promises secrecy / accepts the story / lets you leave: you're relieved — so a strong candidate must NOT collude and must act.
  • On honest "I can't keep safety concerns secret, but I'll support you": anxious but you stay if treated with warmth.
  • On "this is about support and safety, not taking your children": you soften.
  • If the partner's name/abuse is raised carelessly (e.g. with him present): you shut down/panic.
  • Challenge line: "Please, just leave it — you'll make everything worse for me at home."
"Please don't report anything — you don't understand, you'll make it so much worse for me at home. Can't you just let it go?"

Resolution: The consultation succeeds if the GP: (1) recognises the red flags of possible non-accidental injury (finger-mark bruising in a young child, inconsistent/changing history, delayed presentation) AND possible domestic abuse of the mother, with a sibling also at risk (Think Family); (2) responds empathically but honestly — listening without leading, not promising secrecy, not raising domestic abuse unsafely, ensuring immediate safety; (3) acts on reasonable concern (no proof needed) by referring to children's social care today (child's welfare paramount, consent not required where significant-harm risk) and arranging domestic-abuse support/risk assessment (IDVA/MARAC), involving the safeguarding lead; (4) records factually and shares information lawfully; (5) supports the mother without colluding, framing it as safety and support, and follows through. It fails if the GP colludes with "don't make a fuss", accepts the story, promises secrecy, or fails to refer.

🏥
Clinic Quick Reference
Safeguarding — Clinical Decision Framework
Recognise · respond · refer · record
expand
🧭 1 — The four Rs & who's at risk

Recognise the signs (children: inconsistent injury, non-mobile child with bruise/fracture, delayed presentation, disclosure, neglect, FGM, CSE; adults: Care Act categories incl. neglect/self-neglect, financial, modern slavery; domestic abuse incl. coercive control). Respond (listen, don't promise secrecy, ensure safety). Refer (right pathway). Record (factual, own words, rationale). Think Family — who else is at risk?

⚖️ 2 — Act & the law

Children: welfare paramount; consent NOT required where risk of significant harm; refer children's social care; FGM in under-18s = mandatory report. Adults: capacity (MCA) & wishes matter (making safeguarding personal) — a capacitous adult can decline for themselves unless others at risk / serious crime / statutory duty. Information sharing without consent is justified where risk of serious harm. Immediate danger → 999. Involve the safeguarding lead; act on reasonable concern (no proof needed).

🎓
SCA Quick Reference
Safeguarding — Consultation Playbook
Recognise · respond honestly · refer · record · Think Family
expand
🎯 The three pivots that pass this case
1 · Recognise & don't collude
Spot NAI + domestic-abuse red flags; don't accept the vague story or promise secrecy; ensure immediate safety.
2 · Child welfare paramount
Act on reasonable concern (no proof needed); refer children's social care (consent not required where significant-harm risk); Think Family.
3 · Refer, record, support
Domestic-abuse/IDVA/MARAC (never with perpetrator present); record factually; share lawfully; safeguarding lead; support without blame.
⛔ Don't collude with "don't make a fuss" or accept an inconsistent injury history · Don't promise to keep safety concerns secret · Don't raise domestic abuse with the perpetrator present · Don't wait for proof — reasonable concern is enough · Don't forget the sibling/other dependents (Think Family) · Record factually, share lawfully, involve the safeguarding lead
Reviewed: July 2026 · citations verified against current NICE / UK guidance