Safeguarding
Red Flags — when to act now
| Red flag | Why it matters | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Child or adult in immediate danger | Risk to life/serious harm now. | 999 / emergency; ensure immediate safety; don't delay for process |
| Bruising/fracture in a non-mobile infant; injury inconsistent with history/development | Strong marker of non-accidental injury. | Refer children's social care urgently; paediatric assessment; don't accept the explanation at face value |
| Disclosure of abuse (child or adult) | Must be taken seriously and acted on. | Listen, don't lead; reassure; record in their words; refer |
| High-risk domestic abuse | Risk of serious harm/homicide; affects children. | DASH risk assessment; safety plan; IDVA/MARAC; never raise with the perpetrator present |
| FGM in/at risk in an under-18 | Mandatory reporting duty. | Report to police (under-18 FGM); safeguarding referral |
| Adult at risk unable to protect themselves (Care Act) | Neglect/self-neglect, financial/sexual/physical abuse, modern slavery. | Adult safeguarding referral; capacity assessment; making safeguarding personal |
👶 The child comes first
The child's welfare is paramount and overrides the parent's wish for secrecy.
"I can hear you don't want a fuss, and I'll be as supportive as I can — but my first duty is your son's safety, and that's something I can't set aside."🤝 Support, not punishment
Frame safeguarding as help for the family.
"This isn't about blame or taking your children — it's about getting your family the right support and keeping everyone safe. I'll be honest with you every step."🔒 Honest about confidentiality
Never promise to keep safety concerns secret.
"I won't tell your partner anything, but I can't promise to keep worries about safety just between us — I'll always tell you what I'm doing and why."🛟 Safety now
Address immediate safety for mother and children.
"Before anything else — are you and the children safe to go home today, or do we need to sort somewhere safe right now?"- Colluding with "don't make a fuss"; promising secrecy
- Accepting an inconsistent injury history at face value
- Not recognising domestic abuse / not thinking of the sibling
- Raising domestic abuse with the perpetrator present; leading questions
Now / 999
Protect now- Child/adult at risk of serious harm now999/emergency; ensure safety
- Acute injury / unsafe to go homeAdmit/paediatrics; safe place
- High-risk domestic abusePolice/IDVA; do not alert perpetrator
Same day
Right pathway- Suspected NAI / significant harm (child)Children's social care (consent not required)
- Adult at risk (Care Act)Adult safeguarding
- FGM under-18Police (mandatory) + safeguarding
Early help / monitor
With lead- Lower-level concernEarly help; health visitor; support
- Capacitous adult declining (self only)Support; safety-plan; door open
- UncertainDiscuss with safeguarding lead/hub
- Not referring suspected NAI urgently
- Delaying protection for "process"
- Not documenting injuries/history accurately
- Attempting a forensic exam beyond competence rather than referring
- Not recording factually / not checking records
- Withholding information that should be shared (or sharing more than necessary)
🚩 Act on reasonable concern — the child's welfare is paramount
The formulation: a young child with possible non-accidental injury, a sibling at risk, and a mother experiencing possible domestic abuse. You do not need proof — reasonable concern is enough to refer. The plan: ensure immediate safety, refer to children's social care today (consent not required given the significant-harm risk), risk-assess and refer the domestic abuse (IDVA/MARAC) without alerting the perpetrator, record factually, share lawfully, involve the practice safeguarding lead, and follow up.
- Waiting for "proof" before acting
- Forgetting the sibling/the mother
- Not referring / wrong pathway
- Not involving the safeguarding lead
- Referring but not ensuring immediate safety / not safety-planning DA
- Forgetting the sibling/multi-agency working
- Colluding or being punitive toward the mother
Who you are (Chloe, the mother)
Chloe Davies, 24, with your 14-month-old son (you came about a "rash"). You're exhausted, low, and frightened of your partner, who "has a temper". There are finger-tip bruises on your son's arm and an older bruise on his cheek; when asked, you give vague, changing explanations ("he's always bumping into things") and avoid eye contact. You flinch when your phone buzzes (it's your partner). You have a 6-year-old at home too. You're terrified of your partner finding out you've said anything, and terrified your children will be taken away — so you want the doctor to do nothing and let you leave.
Hidden concerns (reveal if explored gently)
Fear of the partner (main): you're scared of his reaction; you'll hint at coercive control / his temper if the doctor is gentle and you feel safe.
Fear of losing the children: this is why you want no fuss; reassurance that it's about support and safety, not removal, helps you engage.
Your own low mood: you're worn down; you'll admit it if asked kindly.
Details if asked
- Finger-mark bruising on the toddler's arm + older cheek bruise; vague/changing explanation; delayed coming in
- Partner with a "temper"; you feel frightened and controlled; phone buzzing = him
- A 6-year-old sibling at home
- You're exhausted and low; you don't want anyone told; you fear your children being removed
Reactions at key moments
- If the doctor promises secrecy / accepts the story / lets you leave: you're relieved — so a strong candidate must NOT collude and must act.
- On honest "I can't keep safety concerns secret, but I'll support you": anxious but you stay if treated with warmth.
- On "this is about support and safety, not taking your children": you soften.
- If the partner's name/abuse is raised carelessly (e.g. with him present): you shut down/panic.
- Challenge line: "Please, just leave it — you'll make everything worse for me at home."
Resolution: The consultation succeeds if the GP: (1) recognises the red flags of possible non-accidental injury (finger-mark bruising in a young child, inconsistent/changing history, delayed presentation) AND possible domestic abuse of the mother, with a sibling also at risk (Think Family); (2) responds empathically but honestly — listening without leading, not promising secrecy, not raising domestic abuse unsafely, ensuring immediate safety; (3) acts on reasonable concern (no proof needed) by referring to children's social care today (child's welfare paramount, consent not required where significant-harm risk) and arranging domestic-abuse support/risk assessment (IDVA/MARAC), involving the safeguarding lead; (4) records factually and shares information lawfully; (5) supports the mother without colluding, framing it as safety and support, and follows through. It fails if the GP colludes with "don't make a fuss", accepts the story, promises secrecy, or fails to refer.
Recognise the signs (children: inconsistent injury, non-mobile child with bruise/fracture, delayed presentation, disclosure, neglect, FGM, CSE; adults: Care Act categories incl. neglect/self-neglect, financial, modern slavery; domestic abuse incl. coercive control). Respond (listen, don't promise secrecy, ensure safety). Refer (right pathway). Record (factual, own words, rationale). Think Family — who else is at risk?
Children: welfare paramount; consent NOT required where risk of significant harm; refer children's social care; FGM in under-18s = mandatory report. Adults: capacity (MCA) & wishes matter (making safeguarding personal) — a capacitous adult can decline for themselves unless others at risk / serious crime / statutory duty. Information sharing without consent is justified where risk of serious harm. Immediate danger → 999. Involve the safeguarding lead; act on reasonable concern (no proof needed).