SCA practice case · Telephone consultation
“My bones are crumbling — am I going to end up in a wheelchair?”
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Patricia Naylor · 67 years · female
Setting
Telephone — DEXA result after a wrist fracture.
Past history
- Wrist fracture 8 weeks ago (fall from standing)
- Early menopause (44)
- Ex-smoker
Medication
- No regular medication
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ DXA: hip T-score −2.7. FRAX high. Mother: hip fracture. No bone-protection treatment on file.
Reason for contact
“I want to know how bad my bone scan is.”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A T-score ≤−2.5 is osteoporosis, and a low-trauma (fragility) fracture plus a high FRAX places this patient firmly in the treat category (NICE NG259 risk assessment; NOGG 2024 thresholds; NICE TA464) — the goal is preventing the next, more serious fracture (hip/spine). The first task is accurate reframing: osteoporosis is reduced bone density and increased fracture risk — treatable and modifiable — NOT "crumbling" or inevitable disability, the catastrophic picture night-time googling produces. The second is honest, balanced bisphosphonate information: the feared harms (osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture) are very rare and dose/context-dependent (MHRA Drug Safety Update, July 2015 and June 2011), while the fracture-prevention benefit is substantial; common GI effects are manageable with correct administration. Add the full package — calcium/vitamin D, weight-bearing/resistance exercise, smoking/alcohol, falls prevention, dental check — and offer alternatives if declined/not tolerated. The examinable hidden agenda is the mother who fractured a hip, went to a home and died within a year; treatment plus falls prevention is precisely how she AVOIDS that fate. Reframe with warmth, give real numbers, and support an informed, shared decision rather than steam-rollering or accepting a scare-story refusal.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.