SCA practice case · Video consultation
“I only ended up in A&E because I had a cold — I’m back to normal now, no need to fuss”
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Kwame Boateng · 31 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — post-A&E asthma review.
Past history
- Asthma
- A&E attendance with acute asthma 10 days ago
Medication
- Preventer and reliever inhalers on repeat
- Recent oral prednisolone course
Allergies
Not recorded
Recent notes
⚠ A&E 10 days ago: acute asthma attack — nebulisers and oral prednisolone. Post-attack review.
Reason for contact
“It was a one-off, I just had a cold. I’m back to normal — no need to fuss.”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
The post-attack asthma review is high-value because a recent ATTACK requiring A&E or oral steroids is one of the STRONGEST predictors of a future severe or fatal attack — so the patient’s "it was just a cold, I’m fine, no fuss" minimisation must be gently but clearly countered: needing A&E and steroids means the asthma was dangerously out of control, and understanding why prevents the next event. Reconstruct the attack (how it built, what he did, any delay in seeking help — common and dangerous) and elicit the ADHERENCE TRUTH NON-JUDGEMENTALLY — whether the preventer was being taken regularly, technique, running out, reliever over-reliance — normalising that many people drift off the preventer when well, to get the real rather than defensive story. Reassess current control and document risk factors for future attacks (previous near-fatal/ICU attacks, multiple A&E/admissions, high SABA use, poor adherence, no action plan, smoking, allergy/anxiety, social factors). OPTIMISE treatment in the NICE NG245 order — address adherence, inhaler technique, triggers and alternative diagnoses first, then move from regular low-dose ICS plus SABA to low-dose ICS-formoterol MART (moderate-dose MART and specialist advice if still uncontrolled), confirm the steroid course completed (dose per BNF), and address reliever over-reliance (MHRA, April 2025: no SABA without an ICS). Co-create a PERSONALISED ASTHMA ACTION PLAN (recognise deterioration, when to step up, when to seek emergency help — written plans reduce attacks and deaths), address triggers and flu vaccine eligibility (Green Book chapter 19), and arrange STRUCTURED post-exacerbation FOLLOW-UP (NICE QS25: general practice follow-up within 2 working days of emergency care, then a review a few weeks after any treatment change, with ongoing annual review). The communication skill is validating that he feels well now, surfacing the adherence story without judgement, and converting a minimised event into engagement and a concrete plan rather than colluding with "nothing to discuss".
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.