SCA practice case · Telephone consultation

“He only wheezes when he’s got a cold”

Telephone consultation Child patient Someone else speaking Straightforward Children & young peopleLong-term conditions & cancer

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Reuben · 2 years · male
Setting
Telephone — recurrent wheeze with colds in a 2-year-old.
Past history
  • Recurrent wheeze with colds (4 episodes this winter)
  • No PICU admissions
Medication
  • Salbutamol pMDI with spacer and mask (from A&E)
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ A&E last episode: wheeze, salbutamol given, discharged. No asthma diagnosis on record. Smoker in household (father).
Reason for contact
Telephone call booked by father. “Has he got asthma, and should he be on a brown inhaler?”

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Episodic viral-induced wheeze (wheeze only with colds, symptom-free between, very young child) is distinct from asthma and generally does NOT warrant an asthma label or a regular inhaled-steroid preventer at age 2 without interval or atopic features — the right answer to "should he be on a brown inhaler?" is often a well-explained "not for now" (NICE NG245: an 8 to 12 week ICS trial is considered only when symptoms suggest a need for maintenance therapy or there are severe acute episodes). The highest-yield practical intervention is INHALER TECHNIQUE: salbutamol via a spacer with a face mask (one puff, several tidal breaths, good seal), which works as well as a nebuliser when done correctly and which the father flagged he was getting wrong. The examinable hidden agenda is parental guilt about smoking (and feeling judged) plus anxiety from his own childhood asthma; the smoking is a major modifiable trigger that must be addressed with compassion and cessation support, not shame, or he disengages. Assess and safety-net current severity, give a written action plan with explicit escalation criteria, and arrange a technique check and review.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.