SCA practice case · Video consultation

“The midwife said one of my baby’s testicles isn’t in the right place — is that serious? Will he be okay?”

Video consultation Child patient Someone else speaking Straightforward Children & young peopleGender, reproductive & sexual health

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Rory, with his mother · 8 weeks · male
Setting
Video consultation, parent present, with the genital examination (warm room, mobility test) arranged face to face — an empty scrotum found at the baby check.
Past history
  • Unilateral empty scrotum noted at infant checks
Medication
  • Nil
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
6–8-week infant physical examination: one testis not in the scrotum. No referral recorded.
Reason for contact
“One of his testicles isn’t in the right place. Is it serious? Will he be okay?”

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
UNDESCENDED TESTIS (CRYPTORCHIDISM) presents when a testis is not palpable in the scrotum — found at the newborn/6–8-week checks or noticed by a parent — and the first task is to EXAMINE properly, face to face, in a warm room with warm hands and a relaxed, warm child (cold or anxiety triggers the cremasteric reflex and can mimic an undescended testis), establishing whether the testis is in the scrotum, PALPABLE in the inguinal canal (and gently manipulable), or truly IMPALPABLE, examining both sides and the genitalia. The key distinction is between a RETRACTILE testis — which can be brought to the bottom of the scrotum without tension and STAYS there at least briefly, is usually benign, needs no surgery and is reviewed yearly until puberty because some later ascend — and a TRUE UNDESCENDED testis, which cannot be brought into/kept in the scrotum; this avoids both over-referral and missing a genuine UDT. The must-not-misses are BILATERAL undescended testes at the newborn check (senior paediatric review within 24 hours, NIPE) and ANY undescended testis with hypospadias, micropenis, bifid scrotum or atypical genitalia, which may indicate a disorder of sex development or endocrine cause (e.g. congenital adrenal hyperplasia) and needs SAME-DAY paediatric assessment; acute groin or abdominal pain with an undescended testis is possible torsion needing immediate emergency surgical assessment (GIRFT/BAUS pathway). On the pathway and timing (NHS NIPE): a testis still undescended at the 6–8-week check, or found later, is referred NOW to paediatric surgery or urology, with no ultrasound first (it does not reliably locate the testis or change the need for surgical assessment), for ORCHIDOPEXY (surgical placement/fixation in the scrotum) ideally at 6–12 months and by 18 months at the latest (EAU/ESPU 2026, international) — timing matters because earlier surgery improves fertility outcomes, and spontaneous descent after about 6 months (corrected age) is uncommon — and an acquired/ascending testis (previously descended, now undescended) also needs surgical referral. Counsel parents honestly but proportionately that a persistently undescended testis is associated with impaired FERTILITY and an increased, harder-to-detect risk of TESTICULAR CANCER, which is why timely orchidopexy (reducing but not removing the cancer risk; Pettersson, NEJM 2007) and, from puberty, testicular SELF-AWARENESS are advised — framing this as the reason for treatment, not alarm. Reassure proportionately (it is common, often resolves or is correctable, with a good outlook after timely treatment), explain the plan, support the anxious parent, and safety-net.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.