SCA practice case · Telephone consultation

“The number that changed when she conceived”

Telephone consultation Adult patient Typical Gender, reproductive & sexual healthInvestigations & results

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Aoife Brennan · 34 years · female
Setting
Telephone — newly pregnant, anxious about a thyroid result.
Past history
  • Pregnant — about 6 weeks (booking completed)
  • Miscarriage ×2 (8 and 10 weeks), no investigations recorded
Medication
  • Pregnancy multivitamin with folic acid (OTC)
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Booking bloods: TSH 5.8 mU/L, free T4 11.9 pmol/L, TPO antibodies positive. No previous TFTs on file. Midwife letter asks GP to review.
Reason for contact
Telephone appointment. Reception note: “crying, wants to know about her thyroid”.

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
The same TSH that means "monitor, don’t treat" in a non-pregnant woman means "act now" in early pregnancy with positive TPO antibodies — NICE NG145 does not cover pregnancy; RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 76 (2025) takes 4.0 mU/L as the TSH upper limit where the lab has no pregnancy range, and antibody-positivity tips toward treatment. Repeat TFTs within 3 weeks (here, within days), get same-day antenatal thyroid advice, and if confirmed consider levothyroxine aiming for TSH 2.5 or less, rechecking every 4–6 weeks until 20 weeks, titrating with the obstetric/endocrine team. But this is barely an endocrine consultation: it is a grief-and-guilt consultation wearing a blood result. Respond to the distress first, answer the "did my thyroid kill them?" question with rigorous honesty (association is not retrospective causation; the past cannot be diagnosed; what we CAN do is act now), and dismantle the self-blame with evidence — miscarriage is common, rarely the mother’s doing, and autoimmune thyroid disease is not a failing. Recognise two prior losses as deserving assessment (RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 17, 2023, defines recurrent miscarriage as three or more losses but supports evaluation after two where clinically appropriate), not "bad luck", and walk beside her with concrete action and honest, non-false reassurance.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.