SCA practice case · Video consultation
“Yellow, and back from Goa”
Video consultation
Adult patient
Typical
New & undifferentiated presentationsInvestigations & results
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Jay Mistry · 26 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — jaundice 10 days after returning from travel.
Past history
- Nil significant
- Occupation: chef
Medication
- No regular medication
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Back 12 days from a month in India and South-East Asia. Jaundiced 4 days. Bloods today: ALT 1840, AST 1100, bilirubin 96, ALP mildly up, INR normal. No hepatitis or HIV serology on file.
Reason for contact
Video consultation: “I’ve gone yellow, I need to get back to work.”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Jaundice in a young returning traveller with ALT >1000 is acute viral hepatitis until proven otherwise — most likely A or E (faeco-oral) given the travel, and usually self-limiting. But the case is built on two things beyond the diagnosis. First, the public-health duty: he is a CHEF, hepatitis A/E is notifiable and faeco-orally spread, so he must be notified (on clinical suspicion) and excluded from food handling until 7 days after the onset of jaundice (UKHSA, 2024), with household and sexual contacts assessed for hepatitis A vaccine within 14 days of exposure. Second, the hidden agenda: a non-judgemental risk history reveals unprotected sex and an unsterile tattoo abroad and a terror of blood-borne/sexual infection (hep B, C, HIV) and of confessing to his girlfriend. Test the full panel (with HIV consent and honest windows), screen for acute liver failure red flags, give hepatotoxin/alcohol advice, and support the disclosure and partner-testing with compassion rather than a lecture. (Note: jaundice in an OLDER patient is a different animal — refers people aged 40 and over with jaundice on a suspected pancreatic cancer pathway — which does not apply to Jay at 26, and is why pinning the cause matters.)
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.