SCA practice case · Telephone consultation

“My right ear’s gone muffled — it’s just wax, isn’t it?”

Telephone consultation Adult patient Typical New & undifferentiated presentationsLong-term conditions & cancer

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Hayley Brooks · 49 years · female
Setting
Telephone — gradual one-sided hearing loss.
Past history
  • Nil significant
  • No ENT history
Medication
  • No regular medication
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Reception note: “Wants drops or syringing for wax, right ear. Muffled for months, ringing.” No otoscopy or audiogram on file.
Reason for contact
Telephone consultation. “It’s just wax, isn’t it?”

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Gradual, persistent, ASYMMETRIC (unilateral) hearing loss with UNILATERAL tinnitus ± imbalance is the red-flag pattern for a retrocochlear lesion — classically an ACOUSTIC NEUROMA (vestibular schwannoma) — and needs audiology/ENT referral with MRI of the internal auditory meati, NOT just wax removal; finding some wax does not explain a persistent asymmetric sensorineural pattern. Establish the time-course (crucially, SUDDEN sensorineural hearing loss is a SEPARATE same-day ENT emergency needing urgent steroids), unilateral vs bilateral, and associated tinnitus/vertigo/facial numbness or weakness; examine the ears to exclude simple wax/effusion but refer regardless for the asymmetric pattern. Reassure accurately — acoustic neuromas are benign, slow-growing and managed effectively, and many asymmetric losses have other treatable causes — so the referral/MRI is precautionary. The hidden agenda is "just wax" minimisation masking a fear of going deaf (career/identity) and possibly of a brain tumour; surface and address it with proportionate reassurance, acknowledge the work impact, arrange the referral, and safety-net the sudden-loss emergency. Genuinely reassuring: acoustic neuromas are BENIGN, slow-growing, and managed effectively (monitoring, surgery or radiotherapy depending on size) — and many cases of asymmetric loss turn out to have other, treatable explanations. So the referral/MRI is precautionary and good practice, not a sign of disaster.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.