SCA practice case · Telephone consultation

“The HRT’s made me bleed again”

Telephone consultation Adult patient Typical Gender, reproductive & sexual healthLong-term conditions & cancer

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Denise Wu · 54 years · female
Setting
Telephone — new bleeding several months into HRT.
Past history
  • Menopausal vasomotor symptoms
  • Smoker 10/day
  • BMI 29
Medication
  • Estradiol patch
  • Micronised progesterone (continuous) — started 8 months ago
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
Cervical screening up to date, normal. ⚠ No HRT review since starting.
Reason for contact
Telephone: “the HRT’s made me bleed — can you stop it?”

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Unscheduled bleeding on HRT is not automatically "just the HRT". Bleeding in the first 6 months of continuous combined HRT (or within 3 months of a dose or preparation change) is common and usually settles (NICE NG23, updated April 2026); but bleeding that PERSISTS beyond that window, or is NEW/heavier after settling, requires assessment — examination, endometrial assessment (TVUSS), and referral per the 2024 joint guideline on unscheduled bleeding on HRT (the NICE NG12 endometrial criteria cover postmenopausal bleeding that cannot be attributed to HRT, so NG12 is not the route for bleeding on HRT; the joint guideline decides who needs a suspected cancer referral). The classic error is simply stopping the HRT and considering the problem solved — which both abandons the investigation the bleeding demands and returns the patient to severe symptoms. The examinable hidden agenda is that "stop the HRT" is driven by a friend’s breast-cancer diagnosis and an unspoken fear that HRT (and the bleeding) means cancer. Surface it, give honest proportionate breast-cancer risk information weighed against her severe symptoms, separate the two problems (the bleeding is assessed regardless; the HRT decision is made calmly with real numbers), and keep her symptom control safe.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.