SCA practice case · Video consultation
“I did something stupid and I’m terrified I’ve got HIV — can you test me, secretly?”
Video consultation
Young person patient
Hard
Gender, reproductive & sexual healthChildren & young peopleUrgent & unscheduled care
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Jordan Mescal · 17 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — a frightened teenager requesting an HIV test.
Past history
- Nil recorded
Medication
- None recorded
Allergies
Not recorded
Recent notes
⚠ Self-booked urgent video appointment. No previous sexual-health tests on record.
Reason for contact
“I need an HIV test — and I don’t want my parents told.”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A frightened teenager requesting an HIV test after unprotected sex needs non-judgemental, confidential sexual-health care delivered with calm. He is entitled to confidential care as a competent young person — encourage but do not force involving a parent, and be clear about confidentiality’s safeguarding limits, as this trust enables honest risk assessment. The critical first step is establishing the EXACT timing of the exposure: if it was within 72 hours, assessment for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is urgent and time-critical — refer same-day to sexual health or A&E, as PEP should start as soon as possible (ideally within 24 hours, never beyond 72), and whether it is recommended depends on the type of sex and the partner’s likely HIV status (BHIVA/BASHH 2021). Answer "will it tell me for sure now?" honestly: HIV tests have a window period — a 4th-generation antigen/antibody laboratory test detects about 95% of infections by 4 weeks and a negative result at 45 days or later is conclusive (BHIVA/BASHH/BIA 2020), so a negative test done sooner does not exclude infection and must be repeated; antibody-only home finger-prick tests have a longer window, and syphilis is repeated at about 12 weeks. Take a focused risk history (type of exposure, partner status/risk, condom use, other partners, substances), offer a broader screen (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C if risk factors, with hepatitis B vaccination), calibrate the realistic (usually low) per-exposure transmission risk without dismissing the fear, and discuss PrEP for future risk. Keep a safeguarding lens (consent, exploitation, coercion, vulnerability) and act on concerns. Above all, contain the online-amplified fear with accurate information, a clear testing plan and a safety-net, providing condoms and risk-reduction advice — the emotional containment matters as much as the clinical plan.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.