SCA practice case · Video consultation

“I had a seizure but I’ve started my tablets again — I can keep driving, can’t I? I need my car for work”

Video consultation Adult patient Typical Long-term conditions & cancerProfessional & ethical dilemmas

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Lewis Tran · 34 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — after a breakthrough seizure from missed medication.
Past history
  • Epilepsy (usually well controlled)
Medication
  • Anti-seizure medication (repeat)
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Reports breakthrough seizure last week after missed doses. Now back on medication.
Reason for contact
Video consultation: wants to discuss the seizure and driving.

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A breakthrough seizure after missed medication is both a clinical and a professional consultation. Clinically, explore WHY the medication was missed (busy/forgot, ran out/supply problems, beliefs such as "felt fine", side-effects, cost, chaotic routine) non-judgementally, reinforce that anti-seizure medication must be taken consistently and that abruptly stopping can precipitate seizures (rarely status), and problem-solve adherence (reminders, repeat prescriptions, pharmacy ordering); review seizure type/control/triggers and any injury, consider neurology review/optimisation, and sensitively screen mood and SUDEP/safety awareness. The critical professional/safety duty is DRIVING: after a seizure there is a LEGAL obligation to inform the DVLA and the patient MUST STOP DRIVING — restarting tablets does not change this. The broad rules: Group 1 (car/motorcycle) generally requires a seizure-free period before relicensing (DVLA Assessing fitness to drive, November 2025 edition: 12 months free of any seizure for established epilepsy — the 6-month period applies only after a first unprovoked seizure, and the medication-change route only when the change was on medical advice), while Group 2 (HGV/bus) requires 10 years seizure-free without medication; the exact period is set by DVLA criteria, but the immediate message is stop now and notify, framing that good control and meeting the criteria are the route back to driving. The doctor’s duty is to ADVISE this clearly, explain why, and DOCUMENT it; it is the patient’s legal responsibility to notify and stop, but per GMC Confidentiality: patients’ fitness to drive (2017), if a patient continues to drive against advice and cannot be persuaded, the doctor should make every effort and then contact the DVLA promptly (telling the patient first and confirming in writing afterwards) — confidentiality yielding to public safety. The hidden agenda is fear for his livelihood plus minimisation; be empathetic about the job impact, fix adherence supportively, signpost work/practical support (fit note with amended duties; Access to Work travel funding), and be honest about the driving duty WITHOUT colluding.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.