SCA practice case · Video consultation
“It’s probably just a cyst — I’m too young for anything bad, aren’t I?”
Video consultation
Adult patient
Typical
Long-term conditions & cancerGender, reproductive & sexual health
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Priya Kaushal · 34-year-old woman
Setting
Video consultation — a breast lump she found herself.
Past history
- Two previous pregnancies; has breastfed, not currently feeding
- No breast problems recorded
Medication
- None recorded
Allergies
No allergies recorded
Recent notes
No recent consultations. Booked herself a video appointment: “lump in right breast”.
Reason for contact
Found a lump in her right breast about 3 weeks ago; wants it checked.
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A new, discrete, unexplained breast lump is taken seriously and EXAMINED face to face (both breasts, axillae and nodes, with a chaperone offered and documented; this cannot be done on video) regardless of the patient’s age, the absence of pain, or how well she feels — "painless" is not reassuring (most breast cancers are painless) and "too young" does not exclude it. The NICE NG12 (Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, last updated April 2026) threshold is explicit: people aged 30 AND OVER with an unexplained breast lump (with or without pain) are referred using a SUSPECTED CANCER PATHWAY referral for TRIPLE ASSESSMENT (clinical examination + imaging ± biopsy); under 30 with an unexplained breast lump, consider a non-urgent referral; aged 50 and over with discharge, retraction or other changes of concern in one nipple only are also referred; and a suspected cancer pathway referral should be CONSIDERED for skin changes that suggest breast cancer, or at 30 and over with an unexplained axillary lump (NICE NG12). A benign-feeling examination does NOT override referral. The examinable hidden agenda is that "it’s probably just a cyst / I’m too young / just tell me it’s fine" is FEAR — of cancer, hospitals and the impact on young children — half-hoping to be told it is nothing; colluding with that wish to spare distress is a serious error. Correct the misconceptions, arrange a face-to-face examination with dignity, refer on the NG12 breast pathway with the honest, reassuring message that most referred lumps prove benign, surface and hold the fear, and safety-net and follow up.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.