SCA practice case · Video consultation

“My face and throat swelled up at the restaurant — A&E sent me to you for a ‘plan’”

Video consultation Adult patient Typical Urgent & unscheduled careLong-term conditions & cancer

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Daniel Foster · 27 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — follow-up after an anaphylactic reaction.
Past history
  • Anaphylaxis 5 days ago (suspected peanut)
  • No other history on file
Medication
  • Antihistamine short course (A&E)
  • No auto-injector on record
Allergies
⚠ Suspected peanut — anaphylaxis
Recent notes
⚠ A&E letter: lip/tongue swelling, throat tightness, wheeze, light-headedness, urticaria minutes after a Thai meal. IM adrenaline by paramedics. Discharged on antihistamine. No auto-injector and no allergy referral documented.
Reason for contact
Video follow-up. “A&E said to see you for a plan.”

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Anaphylaxis aftercare is a structured, examinable package. First, confirm the episode was ANAPHYLAXIS — acute onset with AIRWAY (throat tightness/swelling), BREATHING (wheeze/dyspnoea) and/or CIRCULATION (lightheadedness/hypotension/collapse) involvement, usually with skin/mucosal changes — and reinforce that it is life-threatening and that future reactions can be worse, which justifies the plan and auto-injector. The critical teaching is that intramuscular ADRENALINE into the outer thigh is the FIRST-LINE, life-saving treatment given EARLY, and that antihistamines and steroids are NOT a substitute. PRESCRIBE and TEACH the adrenaline auto-injector — technique (cap off, firm injection into the outer mid-thigh, held in place, through clothing if needed), carrying TWO devices at all times (a second dose may be needed and devices can fail), checking expiry and replacing, and training household/partner — using a trainer pen with teach-back. Provide a personalised WRITTEN ACTION PLAN: recognise → adrenaline early → call 999 (state "anaphylaxis") → lie FLAT with legs raised (do not stand or walk — risk of fatal hypotension; sit up only if breathing is easier) → SECOND dose at 5 minutes if no improvement → stay with help — and counsel the BIPHASIC reaction risk, so 999/observation is needed even if the pen works. Recognise that A&E discharge without an auto-injector or specialist referral is a gap against NICE NG258, which advises offering auto-injectors as an interim measure and referral to a specialist allergy service after emergency treatment; arrange ALLERGY CLINIC referral for confirmatory specific-IgE/skin-prick testing, trigger identification (likely peanut ± cross-reactive tree nuts) and dietetic advice, and counsel AVOIDANCE (label-reading, cross-contamination, informing restaurants, allergy card/MedicAlert), asking about asthma and co-factors (alcohol, exercise, NSAIDs) that raise the risk of a severe reaction. Finally, acknowledge and address the psychological impact — anxiety and hypervigilance are common after a near-fatal event — ensure he leaves with two in-date devices and the written plan, confirm competence, and follow up.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.