SCA practice case · Video consultation
“My face and throat swelled up at the restaurant — A&E sent me to you for a ‘plan’”
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Daniel Foster · 27 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — follow-up after an anaphylactic reaction.
Past history
- Anaphylaxis 5 days ago (suspected peanut)
- No other history on file
Medication
- Antihistamine short course (A&E)
- No auto-injector on record
Allergies
⚠ Suspected peanut — anaphylaxis
Recent notes
⚠ A&E letter: lip/tongue swelling, throat tightness, wheeze, light-headedness, urticaria minutes after a Thai meal. IM adrenaline by paramedics. Discharged on antihistamine. No auto-injector and no allergy referral documented.
Reason for contact
Video follow-up. “A&E said to see you for a plan.”
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
Anaphylaxis aftercare is a structured, examinable package. First, confirm the episode was ANAPHYLAXIS — acute onset with AIRWAY (throat tightness/swelling), BREATHING (wheeze/dyspnoea) and/or CIRCULATION (lightheadedness/hypotension/collapse) involvement, usually with skin/mucosal changes — and reinforce that it is life-threatening and that future reactions can be worse, which justifies the plan and auto-injector. The critical teaching is that intramuscular ADRENALINE into the outer thigh is the FIRST-LINE, life-saving treatment given EARLY, and that antihistamines and steroids are NOT a substitute. PRESCRIBE and TEACH the adrenaline auto-injector — technique (cap off, firm injection into the outer mid-thigh, held in place, through clothing if needed), carrying TWO devices at all times (a second dose may be needed and devices can fail), checking expiry and replacing, and training household/partner — using a trainer pen with teach-back. Provide a personalised WRITTEN ACTION PLAN: recognise → adrenaline early → call 999 (state "anaphylaxis") → lie FLAT with legs raised (do not stand or walk — risk of fatal hypotension; sit up only if breathing is easier) → SECOND dose at 5 minutes if no improvement → stay with help — and counsel the BIPHASIC reaction risk, so 999/observation is needed even if the pen works. Recognise that A&E discharge without an auto-injector or specialist referral is a gap against NICE NG258, which advises offering auto-injectors as an interim measure and referral to a specialist allergy service after emergency treatment; arrange ALLERGY CLINIC referral for confirmatory specific-IgE/skin-prick testing, trigger identification (likely peanut ± cross-reactive tree nuts) and dietetic advice, and counsel AVOIDANCE (label-reading, cross-contamination, informing restaurants, allergy card/MedicAlert), asking about asthma and co-factors (alcohol, exercise, NSAIDs) that raise the risk of a severe reaction. Finally, acknowledge and address the psychological impact — anxiety and hypervigilance are common after a near-fatal event — ensure he leaves with two in-date devices and the written plan, confirm competence, and follow up.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.