SCA practice case · Video consultation
“I just need you to sign me off for three months”
Video consultation
Adult patient
Typical
Professional & ethical dilemmasHealth disadvantage & vulnerabilities
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Carl Dobbs · 44 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — request for a fit note.
Past history
- Back strain, current episode
Medication
- Nil regular
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Warehouse operative. No fit notes issued for this episode. Booking note: "needs sick note for back."
Reason for contact
Video appointment: "sick note, three months."
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A fit note is the GP’s honest clinical OPINION about how a condition affects work — not a patient-dictated entitlement — so signing a three-month total sign-off that the assessment does not support is dishonest and a probity issue, and must be declined. But "declining" is not the consultation: assess the back (confirming the mild, improving, red-flag-free picture grounds the decision), offer the clinically-appropriate alternative ("may be fit with adjustments"/phased return / a short certificate), and — crucially — surface the REAL driver, the hidden agenda of a workplace grievance/disciplinary, money worries and possible genuine work-related stress/low mood, which IS a legitimate, addressable need separate from the unsupported certificate. Offer legitimate help (occupational health, phased return, stress/mood support, union/Citizens Advice signposting). The examinable skill is holding the probity line WITHOUT being defensive, dismissive or confrontational — de-escalating, exploring rather than just refusing, and keeping the therapeutic relationship intact while being honest. On assessment: a mild, mechanical, improving back strain — moving freely, no neurological or red-flag features. There is no clinical basis for a three-month total sign-off; the evidence would support, at most, a short period and/or a phased/adjusted return, not a blanket long certificate.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.