SCA practice case · Video consultation

“Since the new tablets I’m confused, constipated and can’t wee properly”

Video consultation Older adult patient Someone else speaking Typical Older adultsNew & undifferentiated presentations

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Harold Inglis · 78 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — new symptoms after a medication change.
Past history
  • Urinary urgency
  • Chronic back pain
Medication
  • Oxybutynin — started 3 weeks ago
  • Amitriptyline
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Oxybutynin added for urinary urgency three weeks ago. Booked by daughter: “Dad’s gone confused.”
Reason for contact
Video consultation with his daughter present: new confusion, constipation and difficulty passing urine.

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A cluster of new/worsening confusion, constipation, dry mouth, blurred vision and urinary RETENTION coming on over weeks after starting an ANTIMUSCARINIC — on top of other anticholinergics (amitriptyline, a sedating antihistamine) — is ANTICHOLINERGIC TOXICITY / high anticholinergic burden: a reversible IATROGENIC mimic, not "ageing" or new dementia, with the rapid onset linked to a medication change as the giveaway. There is a cruel irony to spot: the oxybutynin given FOR urinary urgency has caused retention. The task is a full medication review INCLUDING OTC items, identifying the stacked anticholinergics and DEPRESCRIBING them (stop oxybutynin; review and taper amitriptyline, which NICE NG59 does not recommend for low back pain; stop the antihistamine; safer alternatives for the urgency, back pain and sleep), assessing the urinary retention (acute retention may need urgent action), and rechecking cognition once off the drugs — avoiding the prescribing cascade of adding more drugs or labelling dementia. The examinable hidden agenda is the family’s unspoken dementia terror; deliver the hopeful, evidence-based reframe (likely reversible, not dementia), handle the OTC disclosure non-judgementally, and follow up to confirm improvement — reversing iatrogenic harm rather than compounding it.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.