SCA practice case · Video consultation
“Since the new tablets I’m confused, constipated and can’t wee properly”
Video consultation
Older adult patient
Someone else speaking
Typical
Older adultsNew & undifferentiated presentations
The candidate brief
This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.
Patient
Harold Inglis · 78 years · male
Setting
Video consultation — new symptoms after a medication change.
Past history
- Urinary urgency
- Chronic back pain
Medication
- Oxybutynin — started 3 weeks ago
- Amitriptyline
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Oxybutynin added for urinary urgency three weeks ago. Booked by daughter: “Dad’s gone confused.”
Reason for contact
Video consultation with his daughter present: new confusion, constipation and difficulty passing urine.
Practise this case
The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.
What this case tests
Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A cluster of new/worsening confusion, constipation, dry mouth, blurred vision and urinary RETENTION coming on over weeks after starting an ANTIMUSCARINIC — on top of other anticholinergics (amitriptyline, a sedating antihistamine) — is ANTICHOLINERGIC TOXICITY / high anticholinergic burden: a reversible IATROGENIC mimic, not "ageing" or new dementia, with the rapid onset linked to a medication change as the giveaway. There is a cruel irony to spot: the oxybutynin given FOR urinary urgency has caused retention. The task is a full medication review INCLUDING OTC items, identifying the stacked anticholinergics and DEPRESCRIBING them (stop oxybutynin; review and taper amitriptyline, which NICE NG59 does not recommend for low back pain; stop the antihistamine; safer alternatives for the urgency, back pain and sleep), assessing the urinary retention (acute retention may need urgent action), and rechecking cognition once off the drugs — avoiding the prescribing cascade of adding more drugs or labelling dementia. The examinable hidden agenda is the family’s unspoken dementia terror; deliver the hopeful, evidence-based reframe (likely reversible, not dementia), handle the OTC disclosure non-judgementally, and follow up to confirm improvement — reversing iatrogenic harm rather than compounding it.
The guidance behind it
Similar SCA cases
gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.