SCA practice case · Telephone consultation

“My test was positive — does this mean he’s cheated?”

Telephone consultation Adult patient Typical Gender, reproductive & sexual healthInvestigations & results

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Orla Devine · 25 years · female
Setting
Telephone — giving a positive chlamydia result.
Past history
  • Nil significant recorded
Medication
  • Combined oral contraceptive pill
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Chlamydia NAAT (taken at pill check after IMB): POSITIVE. No HIV, syphilis or gonorrhoea results on file.
Reason for contact
Telephone: result to give. "Please call re swab result."

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
A positive chlamydia result is clinically simple — common, usually asymptomatic, easily treated (BASHH 2026: doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days, the sole first-line treatment; alternative per BASHH 2026 with sexual-health advice in pregnancy) — with partner notification, an STI screen and abstinence-until-treated. The examinable communication nuance is the "has he cheated?" question: chlamydia can be carried silently for months to YEARS, so a positive test does NOT prove recent infidelity and the timing of acquisition usually cannot be determined — the GP must avoid BOTH confirming infidelity and giving false reassurance, stating the honest uncertainty. The hidden agenda is that the real distress is the RELATIONSHIP (trust/betrayal) and a deeper FERTILITY fear, not the infection: give accurate fertility reassurance (a single treated infection rarely causes infertility; untreated/recurrent infection causing PID is the risk — which is why treatment and partner notification matter), support her through the relationship shock without taking sides, and reframe partner notification as a shared health necessity (with anonymous provider options) so it actually happens. Her IMB with pelvic discomfort needs a PID assessment and examination (BASHH 2019) — offer a full STI screen, and safety-net.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.