SCA practice case · Video consultation

“My smear came back abnormal — do I have cancer? I’m terrified and I don’t understand the letter”

Video consultation Adult patient Typical Gender, reproductive & sexual healthInvestigations & results

The candidate brief

This is what you would read in the 3-minute window before the patient connects. Read it once, note two or three hypotheses and one thing you must not miss, then stop.

Patient
Carla Nunez · 29 years · female
Setting
Video consultation — explaining an abnormal cervical screening result.
Past history
  • Nil recorded
Medication
  • Nil recorded
Allergies
NKDA
Recent notes
⚠ Cervical screening: hrHPV positive; cytology borderline or low-grade dyskaryosis. Direct referral to colposcopy by the programme.
Reason for contact
Video consultation: “worried about my smear letter”.

Practise this case

The full case is in the Hot Seat with the Gold plan. You get a 12-minute timer, a role-player script with facts released only when asked, examiner checkpoints by the three RCGP domains, a model consultation and the guidance behind it.

What this case tests

Show the learning points (spoiler: read after you have practised)
An abnormal cervical screening result terrifies patients, so lead with the central reassurance: cervical screening is SCREENING, designed to detect high-risk HPV and PRE-CANCEROUS cell changes EARLY so they can be treated before any cancer could develop — an abnormal cervical screening result is NOT a diagnosis of cancer. Explain HPV simply and WITHOUT BLAME: it is a very common sexually-transmitted virus that most sexually active people encounter, usually cleared by the immune system, able to lie DORMANT for years, and finding it does not imply promiscuity or partner infidelity — a frequent, distressing worry to address sensitively. Explain that DYSKARYOSIS (or CIN on biopsy) means abnormal but PRE-cancerous cell changes (not cancer), that low-grade changes often resolve spontaneously, and that changes needing treatment are highly treatable with simple procedures that effectively PREVENT cancer. Explain COLPOSCOPY — a magnified look at the cervix ± a small biopsy and, if needed, treatment (e.g. LLETZ, followed by a test of cure about 6 months later; CIN1 instead has a repeat screening test at 12 months), usually quick and done awake — framing it as prevention and describing what to expect to reduce fear and improve attendance. Reinforce the importance of ATTENDING colposcopy (non-attendance is a key risk), continued routine screening (from 1 July 2025, HPV-negative people aged 25–49 are recalled every 5 years), and accurate HPV VACCINATION information (it prevents new infection but does not treat an existing one; NHS eligibility runs to the 25th birthday, Green Book chapter 18a, so she is outside it at 29), and recognise that this is the cervical-SCREENING pathway (a colposcopy referral), distinct from an urgent suspected cancer pathway referral — though symptoms (abnormal, post-coital or intermenstrual bleeding) need face-to-face examination in their own right, and a cervix whose appearance is consistent with cancer warrants considering a suspected cancer pathway referral (NICE NG12). The communication core is fear of cancer and relationship distress; lead with accurate reassurance, explain HPV without blame, demystify colposcopy, validate the fear, check understanding, and ensure she attends.

The guidance behind it

Similar SCA cases

Browse all 359 cases by experience group →

gpreasoning.uk is not affiliated with or endorsed by the RCGP. Our cases are original teaching material written for practice; none is an exam recall. For anything official about the SCA, check the RCGP SCA pages.